QUOTE(Symphony @ Nov 10 2007, 02:25 PM)
Well...it is easy to hype and launch an alternative OS to WM, but it is no mean feat to get all the games, utilities, freewares, maps and many other application developers to produce the whole range consisting of thousands of softwares that currently support WM OS. Even Palm & Symbian Mobile OS cannot thrive, wonder how long Android will survive? The only real competitor so far is perhaps Apple which seem to offer real alternatives to Windows in their ability to think out of the box approach.

Symphony I'm afraid you might be right about only one thing: its easy to build hype (something that MS has often been good at but not often able to follow through).
firstly, i dont get how do you consider long standing, over 72% market share (of Symbian) as "cannot thrive", and a dwarfed 6% market share (of Windows Mobile) as dominant? or you just didnt check the figures yet?
So for the "real competitors", Symbian is not competition, they are already way too head. competition is between WM, Linux, RIM and the likes.
As for Android, thats not an OS, its a platform on top of smartphone OS. thats why even Nokia showed a mild interest in it. I guess they either wanna keep their options open, or remove all hope for any competition.
By the way, before Android was launched, it was trumpted by the media as the "iPhone killer", but once it was revealed its software not a device, its been dubbed the "Windows Mobile killer". now thats something to think about.
Bilal
http://buzzzword.blogspot.com/